Written and published by Simon Callier

Showing posts with label Deciphering Spend Patterns. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Deciphering Spend Patterns. Show all posts

Monday 6 November 2023

Deciphering Business Spend Patterns

Cost management principles define an organisation's use of its financial resources for management accounting reasons in rather broad terms. Category management is defined as a strategic approach to buying, where the organisation segments its spending on purchased products or services with greater accuracy and clarity, based on spend patterns over a period of time.

The segmentation of spend patterns into discrete groups will depend on an organisation's primary functions. Some of the major categories into which an organisation might rationalise their spending could include:

 

  • Overheads.
  • Finance.
  • Operations.
  • Direct / Indirect.

Category management is a systematic cost analysis approach describing how financial resources are used. The descriptive process allows the understanding of past and present spending patterns and is used to decide the options that provides the best approach to leveraging and achieving the greatest benefits. Preserving the savings involves the apportioning of direct and indirect products or services spend patterns by:

 

  • Value.
  • Supplier.
  • Type.
  • Volume.

Associated theories used to help dissect products or services spending patterns include Pareto (80/20 rule) and ABC analysis. From the assimilation of category spend groups, important levels of spend are discerned from where buying attention should focus on leveraging the highest cost and efficiency savings. Category management is the most evolved purchasing strategy of the three common purchasing management approaches, which include:

 

  • Tactical purchasing.
  • Strategic sourcing.
  • Category management.

The simplest form of purchasing is tactical purchasing, a standard process of executing orders through the typical three bids and buy routine. In contrast, higher levels of strategy are employed at the strategic sourcing stage to capture increased levels of supplier value and merge the number of suppliers utilised.

Category management uses an in-depth insight into a market to drive value to entire groups of products and services to evolve them in real-time as the supply market changes or develops. However, category management is not a one-time implementation process, it is based on a continuous evolution and improvement of total lifecycle product or service costing.

Category management is a dynamic approach to price analysis that requires initiative-taking management and a shift towards peak effectiveness and efficiency in buying practices. It is not classified as the strategic sourcing of products or services but as a long-term approach to monitoring supply marketplace dynamics, trends, and the supplier landscape within a particular spend area, often adjusted to reflect changing organisational and supply conditions.

One of a purchasing function's primary roles in category management is guiding stakeholders using targeted questions. However, one of the biggest misunderstandings by an organisation's stakeholders is that a purchasing function is trying to take over the stakeholders' role in the purchasing process. An initiative-taking buying function should be working with stakeholders by helping them to answer the critical questions about:


  • Demand and forecast patterns.
  • Financial and commercial bottle necks.
  • Operational requirements.
  • Quality issues.

To realign category management strategies with business needs and aims, typical outputs of this process might include:

  • Understanding the critical financial strategies.
  • The examination of historical purchasing patterns.
  • Alignment of stakeholders to the distinct features and requirements of the products or services necessary.
  • A shared understanding of what quality looks like and how it should be delivered.

While there is no standard categorisation or grouping of requirements within category management, a general rule is to group products and services that have similar characteristics. Organisations could use the following to group categories:


  • United Nations Standard Products and Services coding
  • UK Governments Common Procurement Vocabulary (CPV) coding

Defining demand patterns and allocating spending categories is a laborious task. It can entail the assimilation of data streams and assimilating a form of analysis to transform the data into meaningful information. This is enacted by considering the following:

Internal Needs: this should set a baseline for the strategic category management process and provide a basic understanding of sub-categories, significant suppliers, essential requirements, stakeholders, and internal controls/policies currently in place. This part of the process is instrumental when reviewing the category management strategy with someone unfamiliar with the category and its scope.

Spend Analysis: the foundation of any category management strategy depends upon having a solid understanding of the historical and forecasted spending. With accurate detail, an organisation will find it easier to formulate a practical strategy. Conducting a thorough spending analysis will enable recommendations to be made to stakeholders, the bare minimum of which should break the spending down by sub-category, supplier, location, and business cost centre.

Supply Market Analysis: understanding the supply market is critical to developing a robust category management strategy. An organisation will gather market intelligence and benchmarking information from various sources. Commonly used market analysis tools are Porter's 5 Forces model and the Structure, Conduct, Performance (SCP) model.

Category Segmentation: segmentation modelling allows an organisation to effectively apply the proper strategic category management for the products or services that are being sourced and will prioritise where the most strategic categories lie. For example, the Kraljic Matrix, developed by Peter Kraljic, is a segmentation model that evaluates the two critical factors of Value and Complexity. These factors are considered on a low to high scale across a 2 x 2 matrix, creating four quadrants or categories such as:


  • Strategic Items (High Value + High Market Complexity/Supply Risk)
  • Leverage Items (High Value + Low Market Complexity/Supply Risk)
  • Bottleneck Items (Low Value + High Market Complexity/Supply Risk)
  • Non-Critical Items (Low Value + Low Market Complexity/Supply Risk)

Category Plan: The category plan will define a list of initiatives, projects or tactics to deliver results. The category plan should:


  • Initiate - define the categories that the purchasing function will manage.
  • Prepare - once the categories are defined, plans need to be evolved to enable a purchasing function to manage the category in alignment with the organisation's needs and requirements.
  • Prioritise - aims need to be set to achieve the organisation's needs and requirements, which could be to source 50% of direct cost products from suppliers in the local area or to source only from environmentally conscious suppliers.
  • Define - the strategies that should be set need to reflect the organisation's needs and requirements. For example, it could be to contact all suppliers within a 50-mile radius and invite them to tender for all indirect cost-related spending areas.
  • Implement - once strategies have been agreed and approved, the purchasing function needs to work with stakeholders to gain their "buy-in" to the category management strategies. These need to be supported by everyone to ensure their effectiveness in achieving the organisation's needs and requirements.
  • Maintain - the purchasing function will set Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or Service Level Agreements (SLAs) to monitor and evaluate supplier performance. A typical KPI could be On Time In Full delivery, or "OTIF".
  • Improve - purchasing is a constantly evolving function, so a relevant category may become obsolete, non-critical or move from direct to indirect spend. The review process is critical to ensure that categories remain relevant.

As organisations face ever-increasing cost management issues, it is essential that they review their current and future spend requirements. Not carrying out a financial review will invariably increase costs by 7 – 9% per annum, higher than the open market.

Helping budget managers to understand where and how they spend an organisation’s financial resources will facilitate their ability to set tendering or negotiation priorities to maximise the reductions in costs for their current and future predicted spending.

However, this requires organisations to become increasingly initiative-taking in reviewing and coordinating their tendering and negotiating activities, which are reliant on having exact spend data. Purchasing in low-performing organisations wait for budget managers to ask for help. In high-performing organisations, purchasing provides the spend data for budget managers to become initiative-taking in their tendering and negotiating activities.


More articles can be found at Procurement and Supply Chain Management Made Simple. A look at procurement and supply chain management issues to assist organisations and people in increasing the quality, efficiency, and effectiveness in the supply of their products and services to customers' delight. ©️ Procurement and Supply Chain Management Made Simple. All rights reserved.