Supply chains are intricate
due to the many elements involved in production, coordination, procurement, and
distribution, significantly influencing an organisation's operational
efficiency. It is critical to understand the many influences affecting supply
chains' efficiency and thoroughly examine the cumulative effects of integrating
the Forrester Effect and its theories. A supply chain encompasses a network of
organisations linked through various processes and activities that generate
value through products and services delivered to the end consumer and the
information shared amongst supply chain partners to make this achievable.
System dynamics seeks to
reveal how minor changes in one segment of the supply chain can interact with
other components, potentially leading to substantial shifts in the overall
system's functionality, effectiveness and efficiency through disproportionate
shifts in time and costs. The various dynamics within the supply chain should
ideally work together to enhance organisational performance, positively
impacting revenue and expenses. However, it is essential to acknowledge that
achieving this alignment is far more challenging than it may initially appear.
To support the case for
implementing these theories, the Forrester Effect theory posits that supply
chain disruptions during the delivery of goods and services to consumers will
inevitably increase associated costs. Such disruptions often result in additional
expenses incurred during delays. In today's business environment, the urgency
for flexibility within supply chains to effectively respond to consumer demands
has never been more critical.
Explaining The Forrester
Effect
The Forrester Effect, often
known as the 'whiplash' or 'bullwhip' effect, describes a supply chain
management phenomenon where consumer demand information becomes increasingly
distorted as it travels upstream. This distortion leads to small fluctuations in
consumer demand, resulting in disproportionately more significant variations in
orders placed with suppliers. Consequently, these demand distortions create a
ripple effect throughout the supply chain, impacting various organisations
involved in the network.
Historical evidence of
bullwhip-like behaviour can be traced back to the 1920s in the United States,
highlighting the long-standing nature of this issue. The principles underlying
the Forrester Effect have been documented across numerous supply chain scenarios,
including those during wartime. Notably, the U.S. Air Corps identified the
Bullwhip Theory during World War I while analysing discrepancies between actual
demand and replenishment orders, marking one of the earliest recognitions of
this phenomenon.
The root causes of the
Bullwhip Theory are often linked to the dynamics of relationships among supply
chain participants. An empirical study of the printing industry has shown that
misaligned incentives can exacerbate this issue, raising concerns among researchers.
In contemporary supply chains, particularly in sectors like construction, some
suppliers may exploit information asymmetries to their advantage, further
complicating negotiations and contributing to the persistence of the Forrester
Effect.
The Historical Context of
The Forrester Effect
In 1958, Jay Wright
Forrester conducted a pivotal study within a company that produced metal,
paper, wood products, and machinery. His findings revealed a significant
amplification of demand fluctuations in an open-loop environment; for instance,
a 15% increase in consumer demand could lead to a staggering 50% rise in
distributor orders. This discovery marked a critical juncture in the discourse
surrounding supply chain management, capturing the attention of key
stakeholders in various supply chain forums.
It took nearly a decade
following Forrester's initial research for additional studies to examine
typical companies' operational dynamics. Among these, only two investigations
addressed the oscillations in order placements, each presenting distinct methodologies
and findings. One of these studies focused on a behavioural analysis within a
two-level supply chain characterised by a periodic demand pattern, ultimately
yielding a descriptive analysis reminiscent of Forrester's original
observations. In contrast, Forrester's study encompassed a three-level supply
chain involving a retailer, distributor, and factory over an 11-year timeframe.
At the same time, the other research compiled 339 observations from a
three-year survey involving a prominent retailer and supplier.
The latter study explored a
conventional 'buy-back' contract model, where the retailer and supermarket
collaborated closely. In this scenario, the retailer monitored consumer demand
and issued purchase orders to the distributor, who, in turn, assessed inventory
levels and placed orders with the supplier, effectively excluding the consumer
from the supply chain equation. This analysis identified four mechanisms to
restore equilibrium within the supply chain, notably adjusting production
schedules from current to future periods.
Additional case studies
indicate that a lack of control and effective communication among remote
segments of the supply chain, along with customised truncations, communication
delays, and misalignment in the replenishment schedules of counterparties, have
led to consumer demand having a limited influence primarily on upstream
operations. These studies highlight that order amplification becomes more
pronounced as one progresses upstream in the supply chain. Furthermore, they
reveal that inventory levels across different supply chain sectors can
fluctuate significantly, often exceeding the variations in consumer demand.
The variability in stock
levels observed across the manufacturing and distribution sectors tends to be
greater than that of consumer demand. Historical analyses of unsynchronised
supply chains corroborate these findings, demonstrating that discrepancies in
supply chain coordination can lead to substantial imbalances. Such insights are
critical for understanding the dynamics of supply chain management and the
importance of synchronisation in effectively meeting consumer needs.
Understanding The Forrester
Effect in Supply Chains
The Forrester effect in
supply chain management relies on key assumptions and principles. A primary
assumption is that consumer demand is random, fluctuating around an average
rate. This unpredictability makes precise demand forecasting impossible, requiring
a trade-off with acceptable stock-out risks for distributors. Consequently, the
randomness of consumer demand affects all supply chain members, causing
amplified demand fluctuations due to misunderstandings or intermittent
stock-outs.
As the distance from the end
consumer increases, demand accuracy decreases for supply chain members. Direct
consumer demand is the most reliable information, leading supply chain
participants to keep substantial buffer stocks to manage risks from unreliable
forecasts. Thus, moving upstream in the supply chain increases demand
variability, causing a pronounced Bullwhip Theory. This suggests that more
supply chain members amplify demand fluctuations.
Two structural supply chain principles worsen demand amplification. The first
emphasises that longer lead times require more extensive buffer stocks to meet
demand. The second states that the optimal order quantity is usually smaller
than the actual shipment due to high variability in order sizes. Additionally,
modern deliveries occur in discrete quantities via ocean, land, and air
transport, complicating inventory management and demand forecasting.
Ocean carriers determine
pricing for shipping space not solely based on the size of the ocean
containers. Similarly, in the food supply chain, perishable goods such as
fruits, dairy, and meats are transported to retailers using specialised
vehicles that cater to specific temperature requirements. The two primary types
of transport are heated trucks and refrigerated vans, which are essential for
transporting fruits during colder months to avoid freezing, thus limiting
deliveries to refrigerated options.
Additionally, industrial
transportation constraints affect both incoming and outgoing shipments. For
instance, manufacturers often restrict the volume of syrup dispatched to
bottling facilities in the beverage canning sector due to the limitations
imposed by the bottling and packaging processes. These operational constraints
amplify the Bullwhip Theory, primarily stemming from a lack of comprehension
regarding these factors within supply chain management.
Consequently, operational
practices significantly influence the escalation of the Bullwhip Theory.
Understanding these principles and adopting a network-oriented approach to
organisational behaviour is crucial for mitigating the Bullwhip Theory. By
enhancing awareness of the intricate processes within the supply chain,
organisations can better manage fluctuations and improve overall efficiency.
Mitigating The Effects
of The Forrester Effect
Various strategies address
the bullwhip and Forrester effects. The key to effective mitigation is
exchanging information among trading partners, a foundational step before
implementing a complex strategy. Recent studies highlight the benefits of
inter-organisational information transparency and technology in addressing
Forrester Theory challenges. Advancements like Collaborative Planning,
Forecasting and Replenishment Systems, Quick Response Systems, and
vendor-managed inventory enable critical data sharing, such as demand forecasts
and production timelines.
One significant advantage of
these technological approaches is the enhancement of demand forecasting
accuracy, leading to lower safety stock levels and decreased stock-outs.
Research indicates that improved inter-organisational information transparency
enables companies to effectively diminish the impact of the Forrester Theory
while boosting supply chain efficiency. The techniques employed to counteract
the bullwhip or Forrester effect are diverse and can be tailored to specific
operational needs.
For instance, it has been
suggested that minimising response or lead times within the supply chain is
essential for mitigating the Forrester effect. Various authors have
demonstrated that 'just-in-time' inventory replenishment systems can help
organisations respond to fluctuating demand patterns more effectively.
Additionally, adopting agile methodologies can further lessen the effects of
demand variability by allowing firms to adapt their internal resources to meet
market demand changes.
Information Sharing and
Transparency With Suppliers
The capacity to disseminate
information both within and between organisations is one of the most formidable
assets for supply chain professionals in addressing various challenges inherent
to supply chains. Traditionally, this capability has faced limitations due to
fears of free-riding and opportunistic behaviours among supply chain partners.
In practice, only a limited number of organisations have successfully adopted a
genuine collaborative model, often relying on decentralised and routine
communication to enhance demand forecasting and improve the precision of
inventory replenishment strategies.
The advent of technologies
such as radio frequency identification (RFID) chips and associated packaging
and product-marking innovations has significantly increased transparency across
numerous supply chain applications. This trend is progressively expanding to
encompass logistics service providers and all manufacturers' customers. A
notable example is the collaboration among thirteen bar-coding manufacturers,
establishing a standard outlining their collaborative efforts within the supply
chain industry. The Quality Information Framework standard specifies how much a
company's systems can share product information, ensuring product authenticity.
The US Automotive Industry
Action Group (AIAG) has also introduced the B4 standards to enhance
connectivity related to ongoing vehicle management, tracking, and diagnostics
initiatives. These initiatives aim to alleviate the challenges faced within the
supply chain. A sequential game model involving optimal contract proposals from
manufacturers to retailers, supplemented by modest additional information, has
significantly reduced average inventory levels across the supply chain.
Furthermore, alternative strategies have included cost-sharing for merchandise
and adjustments to retail sales pricing, contributing to overall efficiency.
Despite a historically tepid
response from supply chain management and logistics professionals regarding
adopting the Internet as an information system, recent discussions with
industry executives reveal significant opportunities presented by this emerging
technology. Executives across various sectors have noted that utilising a
commerce services network for customer payments can lead to an average cost
savings of 40 per cent and a 50 per cent reduction in processing time. This
shift highlights the transformative potential of digital solutions in enhancing
operational efficiency.
In the automotive shipping
sector, integrating advanced technology and improved partnerships has resulted
in a marked decline in transaction errors, showcasing the benefits of a more
connected supply chain. Similarly, the timber industry experienced promising
outcomes, with six successful product launches within the first year of
implementing a new system, alongside a slight reduction in the cost of goods.
These examples underscore the tangible advantages that can be realised through
strategic technological investments.
The energy drink sector has
also witnessed remarkable growth, reporting a revenue increase exceeding 36 per
cent, supported by an investment of £200,000 in real-time supply chain
information systems. Executives are optimistic about the future, projecting
that the benefits derived from enhanced collaboration among supply chain
participants will yield returns that could potentially double their initial
investment annually over the next five years. This trend illustrates how
improved communication and coordination can lower supply chain multi-echelon
inventory costs during service levels through reduced lead times, increasing
overall business efficiency, effectiveness and success.
Additional
articles can be found at Supply Chain Management Made Easy. This site looks at supply
chain management issues to assist organisations and people in increasing the
quality, efficiency, and effectiveness of their product and service supply to
the customers' delight. ©️ Supply Chain Management Made Easy. All rights
reserved.
